Connect with us


How to… Nail year-round riding




Thinking about packing your bike away for the winter? Think again…

Riding in winter conditions is a sure-fire way sharpen up your riding – buildup that confidence in the cold and wet and just imagine how much faster you’ll be when the roads dry out again. Plus, there’s the simple fact you won’t be anywhere near as rusty when the season starts again in spring.

Although the prospect of riding on anything other than balmy summer Sundays will fill some of you with dread, the truth is – with the exception of a few extreme days – our winters here in the UK aren’t anywhere near as bad as we think they are, and are getting warmer.

Add to that the improvements in riding kit, tyre and brake technology and a few forward-thinking local councils who’re improving road surfaces, changing what they use for de-icing, and taking diesel spills a bit more seriously, and the reality of winter riding really isn’t that bad.

Break down the mental barrier that your wheels are going to slip out from under you on every corner, prepare your bike properly, wear the right kit and follow a few basic riding rules, and you can safely extend your riding season ‘till spring. Here’s how:


Dealing with rain:

The key to staying upright on wet roads is to do everything smoothly: no hard or harsh accelerating or braking, and go nice and easy on the clutch and brakes.
Take it steady on the downshifts as the reduced traction makes lockups much more likely, and leave plenty of room between you and vehicle in front to increase your reaction time and reduce the need for heavy braking.
The same goes for cornering too: drop that speed, turn in gently and don’t be trying to get your knee down; slow and steady wins the race…

Stuff to watch out for:

Rain does a great job of spreading oil and diesel spills around, so be aware
Wet roads reflect headlights so can dazzle and distract, especially at night
Steamed up windows in other vehicles means they’re even less likely to see you
Pedestrians tend to keep their head down in wet weather, so keep an eye out


Dealing with wind:

Wind is a tricky thing to deal with. Face-on it can reduce your concentration and tire you out quickly, from behind it can easily push you into riding too fast, and from the side can push you across lanes – or you might even get a combination of all three.

There’s no easy fix, just try to figure out which direction it’s coming from, drop your speed and alter your road position so you’ve space and time to react to being pushed off course.
If it’s really bad, stick to a lower gear so you have more drive and control over the bike and counter steer to help correct your road position.
Try to stay loose and relaxed on the bike – especially your grip on the bars – so if you get blown about it doesn’t affect the bike too much.

Watch out for:

Baggy riding kit will catch the wind and act like a sail, so go for close-fitting kit
Watch for flying debris, dust etc. and keep those eyes behind a visor/goggles
Be careful of gusts coming through gaps in hedges and between buildings
Take care when overtaking large / high-sided vehicles



Not something many riders aim to tackle, but if it dumps a load while you’re at work and you’re forced to ride home, you need to know how to deal with it.
If it’s a thin layer use the same rules as riding in the wet, but be ever more smooth and steady with your acceleration and gear changes, and keep that speed in check.
Stay in as higher gear as possible and keep you revs down to help stop the rear braking traction.Look well ahead and avoid using the brakes altogether if you can. If you can’t, be very gentle and use the rear not the front.

If there are any, aim to ride in the tracks other vehicles have made rather than the fresh, untouched snow.
Deeper snow is passable, but it normally involves paddling the bike through.

Watch out for:

Manhole covers, white lines and other slippery surfaces hiding under the snow
Losing sight of the edge of the road, lanes etc.
Off-camber sections of road and things like sleeping policemen that could unbalance you
Other road users losing control of their vehicles


Ice is a big problem. Avoid riding in it at all if you can.

If you’re lucky enough to spot it whilst riding, and think it only stretches for a short distance, get off the bike and walk with it.
If you find yourself on a patch of ice, don’t touch your brakes or try to swerve off it; gently ease off the throttle and shave off speed gradually, keeping your bike as upright as possible.
If you really have to brake, don’t touch the front, use the back brake only and keep the clutch / drive engaged to try and avoid locking up.

Watch out for:

Areas where water is likely to gather: like dips in the road or near manhole covers and drains
Sections of road in shaded areas, such as underneath trees, where it could be damp and the road temperature could be lower


Fire it up in the comments below:

Phil's probably the shortest motorcycle journalist on the planet, standing just 5ft 4in, but has almost certainly got the longest beard in the industry (we've not measured it yet). Cruiser test then?


When Projects Creep Out of Control




Is ‘more’ always better?

Back in 2008, after more than a decade working in the motorcycle industry, I finally bought my first brand new bike. Like the kid in the proverbial candy store, I wandering through my local motorcycle dealer with my stomach in knots knowing that one of these shiny, magnificent machines would be mine. And like so many people tilted by emotion, despite years of experience and insider knowledge, or perhaps because of it, I let excitement take over the decision making process. I bought a motorcycle far beyond my needs.

It was not long after taking possession of my Yamaha FZ-1 that I realized my mistake. The bike was technically faultless, the problem lay in that it was not at all what I needed. With a tiny fuel capacity and very firm ride it was a lousy touring rig (especially in Quebec where road surface quality is akin to a bombed out airstrip), but conversely it was too bulky and heavy to flick into corners on curvy A roads. It was bigger, faster, incorporated superior suspension and materials technology than it’s predecessor, the Fazer 1000 I helped develop years earlier, an yet somehow the new package was less motorcycle.

When you ask motorcyclists what they want in a new bike, the answer is always “more”. More power, more space, more features. The only thing they don’t want more of is cost. It makes sense, after all we all want more of a good thing. With motorcycles problems often arise when designers and engineers are tasked with piling on those ever increasing specifications to an existing model. This mission creep can, if not managed carefully by a strong project leader, end with a product so packed with features and high specification that it can do everything, but none of it particularly well.

The 1998 – 2004 Yamaha FZS600 Fazer was a wildly successful motorcycle design. At a time when entry level, middle displacement (500cc to 650cc) street bikes were either extremely basic or used obsolete technology, the Fazer delivered modern handling and performance in a user-friendly package. Featuring the engine and brakes from Yamaha’s YZF600R Thundercat, and a compliant chassis made of steel pipe to keep costs down, the little Fazer sold like mad satisfying a wide array of beginners and experienced riders alike.

With motorcycles the temptation is always to add more performance.

Yamaha introduced a mildly revised version two years later, along with the aforementioned larger, 1000cc version. Honda blatantly copied the Fazer formula of packaging supersport technology into an inexpensive package with the CB600F Hornet. Yamaha saw sales plummet, so along with a dozen other designers and engineers I was brought into a group to create the next, all-beating Fazer.

And that’s when the wheels came off the cart.

A whirlwind tour of European cities took place in which we interviewed hundreds of entry-level 600cc customers. The specification list grew longer and longer each day, as the demands of existing users piled on. More fuel tank range! More wind protection! More cargo carrying capacity! And of course… more power! Always more power.

Back at headquarters, the project leader handed over the design brief. As a very young designer I was confused. The new Fazer would now have an R6 motor. It would feature an all aluminum, Deltabox frame, lightweight R6 rims and a 180 section rear tire. Projector headlights. LEDs. Twin, under seat stainless steel exhausts. The brief read like the spec sheet from a top-of-the-line flagship project, not the replacement for Yamaha Motor Europe’s best selling motorcycle.

This is project creep, and it happens when an organization is beset by fear and acts out of ignorance of the big picture. The reasoning behind this phenomenon seems sound: if your opponent has three guys with knives, you better make sure you have six. It makes sense until you discover that you only have enough food for four, and so field six starved, exhausted guys against three strong and healthy ones. In manufacturing history there are hundreds of examples of this, the most famous of which may be the case of the Ford Edsel. It had more of everything than any of its competitors, and yet was so much less car.

With motorcycles the temptation is always to add more performance. After all, motorcyclists are fundamentally sold on the thrill of speed and aggressive handling. The problem is that too much performance makes most motorcycles into unmanageable, sphincter-clenching torture devices. Among our tribe few are skilled enough to exploit even half of the potential of modern bikes, which makes adding high performance to models destined for the rest of us an academic exercise. Of course our egos won’t allow us to admit it, but inside we are terrified of opening the throttle fully mid-corner. So we don’t, and wobble around on large, expensive bikes that not only don’t satisfy, but fill us with regret because we cannot master the objects of our desire.

At the cruiser end of the spectrum, the height of the chopper era saw mature, fully grown manufacturers launch models that were laden with Edsel-like heapings of features. The Honda Rune was presented as the end-all, be-all of the cruiser genre. According to Honda America’s Ray Blank, they “…wanted to set the bar higher than ever, erecting standards that no one else had yet imagined.”.

The result was a seven foot long, 400 kg, six cylinder monster that boasted 50% more torque than Honda’s then flagship superbike.

It was literally the most cruiser you could buy from any mainstream manufacturer, and yet its’ excess was its failure. At $30,000 (US) it wasn’t more expensive than a range topping Harley-Davidson, but the market balked at its bulk and cornucopia of pointless styling. Honda had failed completely to stop the design at some stage and roll it back, asking the team to refocus on what make people yearn to cruise on a motorcycle: the simple joy of sitting astride a large mechanical powertrain suspended between two chunky tires. The Chopper is, by definition, a bike “chopped” down to its basic, core elements. A little baroque styling and flair is cool, but it is not the main attraction.

As an industry, the motorcycle business is not very good at learning the lesson of project creep. The endless fight to produce the sexiest products in the marketplace inevitably drive an arms race that produces some great innovation but also squeezes out lots of poorly conceived motorcycles. If a bike comes out with a strong styling direction that hits the market like a storm, then simply copying it only with a more extreme execution is not going to work. When a competitor eats your lunch, as the Honda Hornet did when it replicated the original Yamaha Fazer concept in 2003, then just doubling down on everything is not going to win the market back.

How did we end up in a place where an entry-level street bike comes with racing style, upside-down forks and a mouse pad for a seat?

The second generation FZS600 (called the FZ6 in North America) that debuted in 2005 with all those crazy upmarket features did well in Europe for a few years, but alienated a lot of customers who loved the original Fazer’s rugged, approachable simplicity. They flocked to the second generation Suzuki SV650S, which was a better Fazer than the new FZ6 (ironically, the Suzuki’s styling was almost a copy of the updated original Fazer). By 2008, Yamaha introduced the FZ6R, a confusingly named but genuine successor to the formula that was simple, cheap, versatile and easy to use. It quietly dropped the over-spec’ed FZ6 Fazer without a replacement a year later.

In the market battlespace, project creep is easily seen in the most hotly contested areas. The 250cc class ballooned to 300cc because Kawasaki needed to edge out the class leading Honda CBR250. Then KTM launched the RC390, resplendent in its superior specification. The new Honda CBR250RR presented this winter is a very far cry from the CBR250 I tested in 2011. In five short years, the baby Honda sport bike went from being what I called “the missing link”, a motorcycle for everyone that the industry so badly needed, to being a mini CBR1000RR World Superbike contender.

I love the look of the CBR250RR, and if I am completely honest I want one rather badly. But how did we end up in a place where an entry-level street bike comes with racing style, upside-down forks and a mouse pad for a seat? I suspect it has a lot to do with looking ahead instead of behind. I’ve seen this show and I know the ending. In five years time the 250cc class will be dead again, because it will have priced itself out of the marketplace.

Getting excited and dreaming of the ultimate motorcycle is the job, but it is also the duty of manufacturers to deliver products people can actually afford and use. The ultimate anything is, as the word suggests, the last of the line. And winning the battle for the ultimate product is meaningless if you destroy the consumer base as a consequence.

Fire it up in the comments below:
Continue Reading





Ladies and Gentleman, motorcycling.

So many things to say, so few cares left to give, but c’mon people? Is this really want we think passes as a way to attract people to a biking festival?

Sure, as the guys from the Two Enthusiasts podcast so eloquently put it in their latest episode, ‘people like to see boobs’. But do you know a better way to double your boob quota for an event?

Yep – like the same guys from the same podcast also suggest – why not produce an environment that’s inclusive to women and may actually encourage them stick around and pay an interest towards these wonderful, two-wheeled machines.

Also, Bridgestone? You should know better. Even Pirelli have stopped that nonsense with their calendar now and moved on to something far more interesting.

Fire it up in the comments below:
Continue Reading

On Fire...

Copyright © 2018 Motofire Limited